89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), both groups different ranging from half a year and eleven years of relationship; 7.76 (SD = 4.01), between a few and you may 19 ages; and (SD = 4.82), ranging from below a year and 31 years. 8%) and stayed which have nearest and dearest, if you’re those people managing the couples was indeed primarily performing some one (69.2%), from which 53% got https://datingranking.net/ebonyflirt-review/ college or university or postgraduate amount. Of certified union users, 67% got school otherwise post-graduate amount, of which 89.8% were working, 2% resigned and you can 8.2% out of work. The functional condition for the married players was equivalent: 89.5% was basically performing, 2.9% were resigned and 6.3% was in fact unemployed, and you will step 1.3% introduced some other work status. Within this group, 62.5% of users got college or university or postgraduate amount.
Relationships High quality, chose to ensure requirements validity, is actually counted towards the Dating Get Mode–Changed (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt
The info shown is actually accumulated within the context regarding greater browse programs, and therefore contains reveal sociodemographic and you will dating research, and also other bills during the extent out-of personal matchmaking.
Personal union is examined with respect to the Portuguese adaptation (Dining table step one) of one’s shorter form of the latest Dedication Size (Stanley, 1986), that has been interpreted according to after the interpretation and you may retroversion strategies: immediately following permission was given by the writer, the first scale is actually translated by the a couple specialists in the field, both of these translations have been exposed to retroversion because of the a few positives, you to bilingual plus one proficient in the employment of this new English language; in the long run, for every variation is actually compared to fresh size, going for the use of the newest terms and items that have higher distance in order to it. The Portuguese type hence contained the latest 14 new items and you may an equivalent answer size and are called, immediately after deliberation because of the class, the personal Commitment Scale (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Towards finally stage of your interpretation techniques, the instrument is applied to three participants towards purpose of guaranteeing brand new adequateness of your own language and also the unambiguous comprehension of stuff, that happen to be talked about towards people once application of brand new survey. Because there have been zero statements claiming or even, the items remained the same.
With regards to the overall duration of the connection, the common, in years, to the additional statuses explained was, respectively: 2
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.
Leave A Comment